Head to head
Ammann ATR 66 vs Bomag BT 60
The Bomag BT 60 has 25kW more power.
Last reviewed 6 October 2026
Key differences
- Engine power: the Bomag BT 60 has 25kW more power.
Specifications side by side
| Ammann ATR 66 | Bomag BT 60 | |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | 66 kg | 58 kg |
| Working width | 280 mm | 230 mm |
| Engine power | 2.7 kW | 2,8 kW |
| Centrifugal force | 22 kN | - |
Sources: Ammann ATR 66, Bomag BT 60. Figures vary by model year and options, so check with the supplier before you commit.
Buy or hire the ATR 66 if...
A petrol rammer for trench backfill, pipe surrounds and compaction against walls and kerbs. Utility crews and groundworkers use rammers like this where a plate cannot fit.
Full ATR 66 specifications →Buy or hire the BT 60 if...
- you want one that has 25kW more power
A light rammer for trench and pipe backfill, kerb bedding and repairs around manholes. Suited to utility crews and small groundworks teams who need to compact in tight spots by hand.
Full BT 60 specifications →Common questions
What is the difference between the Ammann ATR 66 and the Bomag BT 60?
The Bomag BT 60 has 25kW more power. The Ammann ATR 66 is a petrol vibratory rammer for trench and confined-space compaction; the Bomag BT 60 is a petrol vibratory rammer for trenches and confined spaces.
GetBrent is an independent directory and is not a dealer for, nor affiliated with, either manufacturer. Model and brand names are the trademarks of their owners.