Head to head
Ammann ATR 66 vs Bomag BW 135 AD-5
The Bomag BW 135 AD-5 has 338kW more power.
Last reviewed 6 October 2026
Key differences
- Engine power: the Bomag BW 135 AD-5 has 338kW more power.
Specifications side by side
| Ammann ATR 66 | Bomag BW 135 AD-5 | |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | 66 kg | 4.050 kg |
| Working width | 280 mm | 1.300 mm |
| Engine power | 2.7 kW | 34,1 kW |
| Centrifugal force | 22 kN | - |
| Emission stage | - | Stage V / TIER4f |
Sources: Ammann ATR 66, Bomag BW 135 AD-5. Figures vary by model year and options, so check with the supplier before you commit.
Buy or hire the ATR 66 if...
A petrol rammer for trench backfill, pipe surrounds and compaction against walls and kerbs. Utility crews and groundworkers use rammers like this where a plate cannot fit.
Full ATR 66 specifications →Buy or hire the BW 135 AD-5 if...
- you want one that has 338kW more power
A larger light tandem roller for road repairs, driveways, car parks and small paving jobs. Used by surfacing contractors and hire fleets for asphalt and soil compaction.
Full BW 135 AD-5 specifications →Common questions
What is the difference between the Ammann ATR 66 and the Bomag BW 135 AD-5?
The Bomag BW 135 AD-5 has 338kW more power. The Ammann ATR 66 is a petrol vibratory rammer for trench and confined-space compaction; the Bomag BW 135 AD-5 is a light articulated tandem roller for asphalt compaction.
GetBrent is an independent directory and is not a dealer for, nor affiliated with, either manufacturer. Model and brand names are the trademarks of their owners.